Cigar AI Community
Explore real smoke logs from Cigar AI members—what they smoked, how it landed, and the details they chose to share.
Each card is one member's selected public experience, not an editorial review, catalog fact, or community average. Report content or request a rights review.
This Connecticut toro is pretty darn solid. A little pricy but it is a good smoke. Some nuttiness, creamy, a tiny spice on the retro. Slightly more body than most Connecticuts, but not in a bad way. Definitely be in the rotation with a good deal. Slightly more flavorful than Brickhouse Connecticut, but more expensive. Got an hour easy it of this stick.
Read smoke log →
So good every time, love this cigar, sweet and smooth on a cool Saturday night!
Open cigar profile →
Always nice, consistent, aromatic with a lot of smoke.
Open cigar profile →
Creamy flavor as with most Connecticuts, but not much flavor otherwise. Hard to keep this thing lit. If I stepped away for more than 30 seconds it was going out. In my preference, this is below the San Cristobal Elegancia and Pedron Damaso.
Read smoke log →
As Connecticuts go, it was decent. Better experience than last time I smoked one of these. No lighting issues, draw was good, burn was good. Flavor was ok I suppose. A little creamy, a little nutty. Changed my mind on this stick and would smoke again, just not as a first choice but top 4 Connecticut.
Read smoke log →
Gorgeous cigar. Great smell. But tbh, not a lot of flavor other than leather. Was expecting full deep flavors, but just got some pepper and leather. Great everything but flavor.
Read smoke log →
Honestly, nothing too crazy about this stick. Seems to be a standard Connecticut. It is a little creamy on the back of tongue. Actually getting a little citrus . Not that I wouldn't smoke this again, just may not buy it anytime soon.
Read smoke log →
Used v cut. Very light at first. Then started turning dark chocolate and maybe a little almond. Got some pepper on the retro. Moreso than Flor de Antillas. Overall, pretty smooth and around a 5-6 on dark chocolate rich flavor. Will smoke again
Read smoke log →
Bought this not knowing there is a difference between the Maduro and Natural. I found the Natural to have a ton of flavor. This one is more subdued on flavors. Still creamy, toasty, and a little rich. Same draw and burn as Natural. Decent stick, would try again.
Read smoke log →
A nice, creamy, sweet smoke. Need to get more of these!
Open cigar profile →
A cigar with deep flavor, nice sweetness, great evening smoke
Open cigar profile →
Pretty smooth stick. Creamy and a little toasty. IMO has more flavor that Perdomo Anniversary Conn. For the price, would def buy again. Greak morning smoke.
Read smoke log →
A really nice smoke, super smooth with lots of flavor, very little aftertaste, one of my favorites.
Read smoke log →
Very good smoke. Delicious flavors that are sweet and mature, can't really describe it. Earthy, toasted, nutty, sweet. Great smoke!
Read smoke log →
Stick seemed pretty solid. Didn't feel overpowered, and remember it being pleasant. Would definitely smoke again. It was very windy outside when smoking so don't remember too much about flavors other than creaminess.
Read smoke log →
Amazing smoke. Very deep flavors, very pleasant combo (cocoa, fatty nuts, cedar). I've been sticking towards the CT wrappers, but decided to give this a try. This stick will have a permanent place in my rotation from now on.
Read smoke log →
Edit: tried this stick again, and it was significantly better. I must've done something to mess that first stick up. Better flavors: cream, toasted nuts. I was expecting a little more flavor but was not that overpowering. Score is updated. Found this to be very acidic. Tastes of charcoal. For a mild CT, there was honestly not much flavor at all (other than charcoal). This stick gets a lot of praise, so maybe I got a bad stick.
Read smoke log →
Pretty mellow and creamy. Peppery retro. Was definitely a fan. I have this one below San Cristobal Elegancia and Padron Damaso no 8, but very close and holds its own for a $10 cigar.
Read smoke log →
Regulier, doux, mais un peu cendreux en bouche. Belle cendre qui se tient, fumée peu épaisse et qui ne reste pas trop sur les vêtements et en bouche. Cigare léger à déguster en après-midi ou en fin de matinée. A retester sans avoir fumé d'autres vitoles dans la journée.
Read smoke log →
Tried this as one of my first cigars. Had a few more "mature" coffee cigars since. Wanted to come back and revisit this cigar to see if I would still like it. Honestly, it's not too bad. The wrapper sweetness gets a little too much about halfway though, but not a show stopper. Decent/light quick smoke. The only thing I don't like is there is no cap.
Read smoke log →
All time favorite so far in my cigar travels. Great coffee cigar with cream, almond and a little coffee bean flavor. Can't wait to smoke again, hopefully I enjoy that much the second time.
Read smoke log →
Amazing cigar. Could see this as an everyday with coffee. Mild cedar flavors, with strong creamy smoke. I put this above the Caldwell Eastern Standard Cream, but still below the San Cristobal Elegancia.
Read smoke log →
I liked this cigar. Very good, beginner coffee cigar. It falls slightly behind the San Cristobal Elegancia. Definite cream, nutty flavor. One thing I didn't like was a fair amount of static smoke on the ash tray.
Read smoke log →
Log the flavor, rating, and pairing while they are still fresh—then use your history when it is time to choose again.
Free journal and humidor tracking · Limited AI included · No ads · For adults 21+